Labour Law in a Nutshell: November 2020
|Avis was faced with serious incompatibility problems between two managers. They decided to use an operational requirements process to resolve them. They combined the positions of the two incompatible managers. Each was invited by way of internal advertisement to apply for it.
The Labour Appeal Court said the operational requirements process was unfair. This was because incompatibility is a species of incapacity which impacts on work performance – it’s not an operational issue.
The court said it may be a substantively fair reason for dismissal if an employee can’t keep an appropriate standard of relationship with peers, subordinates and superiors.
However, procedural fairness in incompatibility cases requires the employer to –
Then to determine whether –
TIP: The tricky part of dealing with conflicting personalities is often trying to decide who is the most responsible for causing the disharmony. This is a judgement call which should be assessed as far as possible on objective facts instead of subjective opinions. The next step would then be to follow the LAC’s guidelines for conducting a fair incapacity enquiry process.
ONLINE LEGAL SERVICES:
I’m available to discuss your legal issues online by Zoom or Teams video conferencing.
You’re welcome to call or email me to set up a time which suits you.
CELL: 083 375 8771
Zeda Car Leasing (Pty) Ltd t/a Avis Fleet v Van Dyk (2020) 29 LAC 1.11.26 also reported at  6 BLLR 549 (LAC)
Source: Worklaw Annual Review 2020
Edited by Sarah Christie